In-house management performs best for private equity – CEM Benchmarking

first_imgThe cost of outsourcing private equity investment is so high for pension funds that their net returns on the asset class are generally lower than they are for their small-cap investments, according to CEM Benchmarking.CEM principal Mike Heale, speaking at an event organised by IPE sister publication Pensioen Pro, questioned whether pension funds generated sufficient returns for the costs involved, and cited the challenge of finding a proper benchmark.“Sometimes, pension funds take a return of 10%, or the LIBOR rate plus 4%, as a guidance, but these numbers are very bad indicators,” he said. Heale said CEM’s calculations had shown that pension funds that invest in private equity through funds of funds had incurred more than 5.5 percentage points in costs over the last 20 years relative to schemes that manage private equity in-house. He also claimed that pension funds that participate in private equity as limited partners on average incurred 3.24 percentage points in additional expenses.According to CEM, only pension funds that invest directly in private equity – as some Canadian schemes do – have managed to achieve an outperformance – of 2.4 percentage points – resulting in a net return of almost 15%.This approach is similar to the investment policies at APG and PGGM – asset managers for the €380bn Dutch civil service scheme ABP and the €179bn healthcare pension fund PFZW, respectively – which look to manage non-listed equity in-house to avoid the cost of external managers.CEM’s analysis also found a correlation between a scheme’s scale and returns on private equity.It found that schemes with assets of more than $100bn (€91.1bn) achieved 16 basis points of additional returns relative to smaller pension funds.CEM said its survey into the costs and returns of private equity was based on information collected from all of the 367 pension funds in its database.More than 30 Dutch pension funds – representing more than two-thirds of pension assets in the Netherlands – use the services of the Canadian firm.Their asset-management costs were 58.5 basis points on average.last_img read more

UCF’s Tacko Fall on facing Duke’s Zion Williamson: I won’t allow him to dunk on me

first_img7’6″ Tacko Fall next to 5’2″ reporter Tracy Wolfson 😲(via @CBSSports)— Bleacher Report (@BleacherReport) March 22, 2019″It’s very hard [to dunk on me],” Fall told on Friday. “I mean, I won’t allow it. I won’t allow it. I won’t allow him putting me on one of his highlight tapes.”He’s someone, pretty much, we’ve never seen in weight, size. He’s immense, and he’s so quick,” he said of Williamson, who is 6 feet 7 and weighs 284 pounds. “But the coaches are going to have a great game plan, especially Coach [Johnny] Dawkins, I feel like, because he played for Duke, so he’s going to have to help us out a lot.” Related News Zion Williamson out to avoid ‘what ifs’ in March Madness Tacko Fall isn’t concerned about facing Zion Williamson when his UCF Knights take on the Duke Blue Devils in the second round of the NCAA Tournament on Sunday. Williamson has made a name for himself with his monstrous dunks and ability to block most shots that come his way. However, Fall, the tallest player in college basketball at 7 feet 6, vowed he’s not going to let Williamson get away with dunking on him.center_img “I won’t allow it. I won’t allow him to put me on one of his highlight tapes.”After advancing past VCU, @UCF_MBB’s Tacko Fall tells @TheAndyKatz he won’t allow Zion to dunk on him! #MarchMadness— NCAA March Madness (@marchmadness) March 23, 2019Both teams advanced from the first round of the tournament Friday. Top-seeded Duke beat North Dakota State 85-62, and No. 9 UCF topped eighth-seeded VCU, 73-58.last_img read more